U-Games

2 members have put Kane & Lynch: Dead Men on their wishlist, while another 2 even own the game.
zoefkeHerrdidifrederik850
You can manage your own collection by registering or logging in.

Game Details

Kane & Lynch: Dead Men

Kane & Lynch: Dead Men

Available on :
Pc
Xbox 360
Playstation 3
 
Developed by :
Published by :
Genre :
Third Person Action Game

Description

Kane & Lynch: Dead Men follows the violent and chaotic journey of two men - a flawed mercenary and a medicated psychopath – and their brutal attitude towards right and wrong. This volatile partnership combined with innovative technologies allow ...

RSS Feeds

Feeds are per category

News

Gamespot responds!

Posted on Thursday, 6 December 2007 by L0k1-, source: GS
A couple of days ago there was a big fuzz around the firing of Jeff Gerstman. He was a review editor at GameSpot, which had worked 11 years for the company until last week.

17_t2
This firing was linked with the negative Kane & Lynch-review that he had written and was later adjusted. So it didn't take long to start the rumor he got fired because Eidos the publisher of this game demanded his resignation. Reason for this was the heavy advertising of the game at the moment and they didn't like the score their game received.

Gamespot wants to try and reveal the real reason for the firing of their veteran review editor and has released this Q&A.

Q: Was Jeff fired?

A: Jeff was terminated on November 28, 2007, following an internal review process by the managerial team to which he reported.

Q: Why was Jeff fired?

A: Legally, the exact reasons behind his dismissal cannot be revealed. However, they stemmed from issues unrelated to any publisher or advertiser; his departure was due purely for internal reasons.

Q: Why was the Kane & Lynch review text altered?

A: Jeff's supervisors and select members of the edit team felt the review's negativity did not match its "fair" 6.0 rating. The copy was adjusted several days after its publication so that it better meshed with its score, which remained unchanged. The achievements and demerits it received were also left unaltered. Additionally, clarifications were made concerning the game's multiplayer mode and to include differences between the Xbox 360 and PS3 versions of the game.

Q: Why was the Kane & Lynch video review taken down?

A: Both the text and video reviews of Kane & Lynch went up on Tuesday, November 13. The morning of Wednesday, November 14, the video was taken down due to concerns of quality. Specifically, its audio was deemed inferior due to a faulty microphone. There were also concerns about the limited amount of footage, which was unrepresentative of the game in the review.

Q: Why wasn't the video immediately reposted?

A: Due to the crush of high-profile games being released the following week, there were insufficient resources to reshoot and re-edit the video review.

Q: Why hasn't the video review been reposted since the "Gerstmanngate" controversy broke?

A: A determination was made by GameSpot Live, GameSpot's multimedia division, that reposting it would seem reactive and might exacerbate an inflamed situation. However, in the spirit of full disclosure, it has since been reposted, and is viewable on the site in its original form (See above). For those who want to be sure that it has not been altered after the fact, the video review is also available on YouTube for comparison purposes.

Q: Was Eidos Interactive upset by the game's review?

A: It has been confirmed that Eidos representatives expressed their displeasure to their appropriate contacts at GameSpot, but not to editorial directly. It was not the first time a publisher has voiced disappointment with a game review, and it won't be the last. However, it is strict GameSpot policy never to let any such feelings result in a review score to be altered or a video review to be pulled.

Q: Did Eidos' disappointment cause Jeff to be terminated?

A: Absolutely not.

Q: Did Eidos' disappointment cause the alteration of the review text?


A: Absolutely not.

Q: Did Eidos' disappointment lead to the video review being pulled down?

A: Absolutely not.

Q: Why was GameSpot "skinned" with Kane & Lynch ads when Jeff was terminated?

A: Due to design and development considerations, media buys on GameSpot are made weeks in advance. The timing of said ads was extremely unfortunate but was purely coincidental and determined solely by the game's release date of November 13, 2007.

Q: Why did the Kane & Lynch ads disappear from GameSpot right as the "Gerstmanngate" controversy began to heat up?


A: Advertising sales on GameSpot are sold by the day. The end of the Kane & Lynch "skin" promotion had been predetermined long beforehand. Internal documentation filed before the review appeared shows that the site skin was scheduled to run from November 17 to 29, 2007. Site-wide ad campaigns automatically change at midnight, hence the "skin" being removed after hours.

Q: Was Jeff's termination somehow tied to the departure of former GameSpot Live managing producer Tim Tracy?

A: No. Tim and Jeff are childhood friends and had been colleagues until Tim transferred over to other CNET Networks Entertainment properties. His exit was completely unrelated.

Q: Why didn't GameSpot write about Jeff's departure sooner?

A: Due to HR procedures and legal considerations, unauthorized CNET Networks and GameSpot employees are forbidden from commenting on the employment status of current and former employees. This practice has been in effect for years, and the CNET public-relations department stuck to that in the days following Jeff's termination. However, the company is now making an exception due to the widespread misinformation that has spread since Jeff's departure.

Q: When will the PC version of Kane & Lynch be reviewed?

A: We haven't decided when that will happen.

Q: GameSpot's credibility has been called into question as a result of this incident. What is being done to repair and rebuild it?

A: This article is one of the first steps toward restoring users' faith in GameSpot, and an internal review of the incident and controversy is under way. However, at no point in its history has GameSpot ever deviated from its review guidelines, which are publicly listed on the site. Great pains are taken to keep sales and editorial separated to prevent any impression of impropriety.

For years, GameSpot has been known for maintaining the highest ethical standards and having the most reliable and informative game reviews, previews, and news on the Web. The colleagues and friends that Jeff leaves behind here at GameSpot intend to keep it that way.

As Gamespot would say,Bogus or not bogus?
In other news:

9 Comment(s)

Anonymous

Anonymous

"As Gamespot would say,Bogus or not bogus?"


I think a little bit of both. Nobody tells the full truth, ever. If you read close, you can pick out the little things that are obviously avoidance of the questions, or sidetracking. We see politicians do it all the time.

Fact of the matter is, he was an 11 year employee. Chances are if he was going to do something internally bad enough to deem dismissal, one would think it would have happened already.

Apply Akums Razor to the situation. Do you think that there was some big thing happen internally that after 11 years he finally got himself fired over, & Gamespot knowing that with the review (which is way below most other reviews of the game) coupled with the advert would be viewed very negative and a hellova coincidence.

or, did he get fired for posting a review the game company, which is paying for advertising, disliked and (confirmed by gamespot themselves) complained about it.

Its pretty simple.
"As Gamespot would say,Bogus or not bogus?" I think a little bit of both. Nobody tells the full truth, ever. If you read close, you can pick out the little things that are obviously avoidance of the questions, or sidetracking. We see politicians do it all the time. Fact of the matter is, he was an 11 year employee. Chances are if he was going to do something internally bad enough to deem dismissal, one would think it would have happened already. Apply Akums Razor to the situation. Do you think that there was some big thing happen internally that after 11 years he finally got himself fired over, & Gamespot knowing that with the review (which is way below most other reviews of the game) coupled with the advert would be viewed very negative and a hellova coincidence. or, did he get fired for posting a review the game company, which is paying for advertising, disliked and (confirmed by gamespot themselves) complained about it. Its pretty simple.
Quote
Posted on 02:20, December 07th 2007
Anonymous

Anonymous

yeah but do you fire your employee of 11 years after one publisher is upset? There has to be more than meets the eye.
yeah but do you fire your employee of 11 years after one publisher is upset? There has to be more than meets the eye.
Quote
Posted on 02:44, December 07th 2007
Anonymous

Anonymous

Money talks when it comes to the corporate big shots. Eidos pressured gamespot to fire him. People get a sense of job security after many years of service, but are never really safe unless they are in a Union acruing seniority.
Money talks when it comes to the corporate big shots. Eidos pressured gamespot to fire him. People get a sense of job security after many years of service, but are never really safe unless they are in a Union acruing seniority.
Quote
Posted on 13:56, December 07th 2007
Drofder2004

Drofder2004

I honestly believe the editor was fired had partially something to do with K&L review, but as said, you do not fire an 11 year employee over 1 bad review.
I honestly believe the editor was fired had partially something to do with K&L review, but as said, you do not fire an 11 year employee over 1 bad review.
Quote
Posted on 18:01, December 07th 2007
L0k1-

L0k1-

depends, if Eidos threatened to pull all their resources away from Gamespot including future advertisement it could've been a big finanical hit. So they could've though to themself. Lose some major investment or fire an employee? :)

but as the first comment said, we won't know the full truth, only gamespot and the fired employee does.
depends, if Eidos threatened to pull all their resources away from Gamespot including future advertisement it could've been a big finanical hit. So they could've though to themself. Lose some major investment or fire an employee? :) but as the first comment said, we won't know the full truth, only gamespot and the fired employee does.
Quote
Posted on 20:27, December 07th 2007
derf26 (old)

derf26 (old)

As they say, the biggest lies are very close to the truth.
As they say, the biggest lies are very close to the truth.
Quote
Posted on 22:09, December 08th 2007
Anonymous

Anonymous

Gamespot and IGN are nothing but shills for the gaming industry... Go back and review the reviews of the bigger games ... You will see nothing but GLOWING reviews ...Sometimes they might give a game a 7 ... but thats it ... IT all runs thru the advertisers word...
Gamespot and IGN are nothing but shills for the gaming industry... Go back and review the reviews of the bigger games ... You will see nothing but GLOWING reviews ...Sometimes they might give a game a 7 ... but thats it ... IT all runs thru the advertisers word...
Quote
Posted on 04:49, December 10th 2007
Anonymous

Anonymous

D1CKS! Filthy liars I hope they get to play only K&L until their brain melts while we enjoy better games.
D1CKS! Filthy liars I hope they get to play only K&L until their brain melts while we enjoy better games.
Quote
Posted on 10:38, December 10th 2007
Anonymous

Anonymous

mMY ROADKILL CHICK & i LOVE TO TRASH THE BLOGS ....... AND FEEL OFFENDED WHEN WE CANT EVEN OFFEND THE DUBIOUS MENTAL MYOPICS. ALTHOUGH THE AVERAGE COMPANY IS WORTHY OF SATIATED COMPANY FOR OUR SHIBA....CHEERS
mMY ROADKILL CHICK & i LOVE TO TRASH THE BLOGS ....... AND FEEL OFFENDED WHEN WE CANT EVEN OFFEND THE DUBIOUS MENTAL MYOPICS. ALTHOUGH THE AVERAGE COMPANY IS WORTHY OF SATIATED COMPANY FOR OUR SHIBA....CHEERS
Quote
Posted on 05:23, September 27th 2008
 

put your comment here

CrazyCamel UPC
Metriweb TripTracker