News

Microsoft screwing up Live for Windows

Posted on Friday, 11 May 2007 by Speed, source: ExtremeTech
Over at ExtremeTech is word that Microsoft apparently is doing some major screwing up of their Live for Windows service which sees the first games appearing this month (Halo 2 and Shadowrun)

The biggest mistake Microsoft is making with Live on the PC is the way they're treating the PC as if it's a console platform they can control. They're trying to lock out the rest of the world and to charge for features that PC gamers have had for free for ages. It's a shortsighted, greedy scheme that could only come from a product manager or VP who simply doesn't "get" PC gaming. The free Silver level of Xbox Live lets you log in on the PC and earn Achievements just like you do on the 360—but only single-player Achievements. Multiplayer Achievements are only for those $50-a-year Gold members. Player matchmaking is for Gold members only. Voice in games is for Gold members only. Cross-platform play between 360 and PC is for Gold members only. In fact, the only thing silver members can really do is view a server list and hop onto a specific server

Guess the guys at Microsoft need some serious thinking if they think gamers will fall for this and pay for a service that offers stuff we've had for free for years
In other news:

8 Comment(s)

NINJAFISH

NINJAFISH

Wow talk about discouraging the discouraged. Most people arent really into Live gaming as it is, now they pull this crap? No thx.
Wow talk about discouraging the discouraged. Most people arent really into Live gaming as it is, now they pull this crap? No thx.
Quote
Posted on 13:34, May 11th 2007
Anonymous

Anonymous

What's needed is some serious competition!
What's needed is some [b]serious[/b] competition!
Quote
Posted on 13:40, May 11th 2007
Vexxed

Vexxed

Whats needed is Microsoft just leave Live as is, it was designed for a console and works brilliantly on the console, they should be leaving the PC alone as you dont need a service like Live to enjoy online gaming on a PC.

I couldnt care less about cross platform gaming since people who mainly game on PC's generaly dont get on or see eye to eye with people who mainly game on console's, what makes them think that if we play together that will change.
Whats needed is Microsoft just leave Live as is, it was designed for a console and works brilliantly on the console, they should be leaving the PC alone as you dont need a service like Live to enjoy online gaming on a PC. I couldnt care less about cross platform gaming since people who mainly game on PC's generaly dont get on or see eye to eye with people who mainly game on console's, what makes them think that if we play together that will change.
Quote
Posted on 14:31, May 11th 2007
inferno1424

inferno1424

I think the fact that we don't see eye-to-eye is exactly why you bring cross platform gaming to the table. I'd love to whoop you console wielding would-be gamers all night long!! :)
I think the fact that we don't see eye-to-eye is exactly why you bring cross platform gaming to the table. I'd love to whoop you console wielding would-be gamers all night long!! :)
Quote
Posted on 14:53, May 11th 2007
Vexxed

Vexxed

I think the fact that we don't see eye-to-eye is exactly why you bring cross platform gaming to the table. I'd love to whoop you console wielding would-be gamers all night long!! :)


Thanks for prooving my point about us not seeing eye to eye inferno.

Bring it on you office equipment weilding gamer wana be :P
[quote]I think the fact that we don't see eye-to-eye is exactly why you bring cross platform gaming to the table. I'd love to whoop you console wielding would-be gamers all night long!! :)[/quote] Thanks for prooving my point about us not seeing eye to eye inferno. Bring it on you office equipment weilding gamer wana be :P
Quote
Posted on 15:13, May 11th 2007
Anonymous

Anonymous

but its ok to pay £8 per month for WOW £8 per month for lord of the rings on line and how ever many other life sapping games you pay sub fees for.
but its ok to pay £8 per month for WOW £8 per month for lord of the rings on line and how ever many other life sapping games you pay sub fees for.
Quote
Posted on 19:07, May 11th 2007
derf26 (old)

derf26 (old)

but its ok to pay £8 per month for WOW £8 per month for lord of the rings on line and how ever many other life sapping games you pay sub fees for.


If an MMO is a peice of crap like WoW where they spend under 1% of their profit on improving the game, then no we shouldn't. If it's a game like Eve where pretty much 80-90% of their money goes into expansion packs and the like, then yes. THough tbh it hsould still be lower. Perhalps £4-5.
[quote]but its ok to pay £8 per month for WOW £8 per month for lord of the rings on line and how ever many other life sapping games you pay sub fees for.[/quote] If an MMO is a peice of crap like WoW where they spend under 1% of their profit on improving the game, then no we shouldn't. If it's a game like Eve where pretty much 80-90% of their money goes into expansion packs and the like, then yes. THough tbh it hsould still be lower. Perhalps £4-5.
Quote
Posted on 11:29, May 12th 2007
derf26 (old)

derf26 (old)

And about Microsoft. I wholly approve.

You see, the more M$ pulls crap like this, the more they lose respect and market share. Fine by me tbh :) I haven't paid for an M$ product in 10 years, and won't until they start bringing up value for money.
And about Microsoft. I wholly approve. You see, the more M$ pulls crap like this, the more they lose respect and market share. Fine by me tbh :) I haven't paid for an M$ product in 10 years, and won't until they start bringing up value for money.
Quote
Posted on 11:30, May 12th 2007
 

put your comment here

CrazyCamel
Metriweb TripTracker