I'm a bit disappointed about the graphics. It may look cool in singleplayer, but those models here just look aweful. And on top of that, i guess you need a pretty HUGE tv to actually see something on the 4-player splitscreen.

Yea, the graphics didn't really look all that great, even compared to the previous generation. But if the game play is there it shouldn't matter too much. And were those people really necessary? I mean I know their trying to make it look like people are having fun, and I'm sure they would, but it was kind of retarded the way they had them in there.

In general the graphics on the Wii are shit. If you haven't realized this yet, you are in for a big disappointment if you buy that crap.

In my 15 years of playing I realized that the most important is the gamplay i.e. WolfET vs BF2 obiously bf2 has better graphics but ET has better gameplay. People who only cares about graphic are usually low-aged or simple minded.

If you like either WolfET or BF2, well, that is simply a matter of personal taste, nothing more. For me graphics count almost as much as gameplay. If a game looks like shit, I just won't play it - it has nothing to do with age or being simpleminded.

[quote]If you like either WolfET or BF2, well, that is simply a matter of personal taste, nothing more. For me graphics count almost as much as gameplay. If a game looks like shit, I just won't play it - it has nothing to do with age or being simpleminded.[/quote] Game play > Graphics Its true that usually kids care more about graphics then game play, and those of the closed minded nature that would completely disregard a game because of its lacking graphics.

[quote]In general the graphics on the Wii are shit. If you haven't realized this yet, you are in for a big disappointment if you buy that crap.[/quote] You are discarding hundreds of future games only becaue of graphics ? Even when we dont know how far can go new controller posibilities ? [quote]If you like either WolfET or BF2, well, that is simply a matter of personal taste, nothing more.[/quote] That was only an example with even diferent engine generation. I mean, for me its more important class based shooters than flag based shooters despite the graphics level. I agree with ninnjafish in the rest

wtf is processing that counts. the wii mote does not do much more than a eye toy and a mouse could pull off. wii grafix are bad but it will still make some good games but they will look and feel the same as the ps2 or gc games.if the consoles has a powerful processer then it can handle more and show how games have evolved over the years.the wii mote is nothing more than a adaption for the wii and the console itsself is weak and not next gen. the control is but that has already been cloned for the 360 and ps3

Agreed. The Wii remote doesn't seem too revolutionary to me, hell PS3 could just make a simple add on remote or whatever and make games like that just as they've done with Eye toy and Guitar hero. Wii would be revolutionary if it were backed up with quality graphics, imo it hasn't been the leap that I was expecting and I think that the novelty will wear off after a few months of playing.

[quote]In general the graphics on the Wii are shit. If you haven't realized this yet, you are in for a big disappointment if you buy that crap.[/quote] if your are really hung up on graphics then quit bithcing and get a console u think has better graphics, so sick and tired of people bitchin about the graphics who catres if the gameplay is good if you are a hardcore gamer then just shut your trap hole and walk past the wii!

I think the people that care more about graphics than gameplay should just custom design their own game cuz trust me even some ps3 game's graphics suck like hell, the game can be amazing and the whole point of playing a game is for teh gameplay and ingenuity of the game if you are so hung up on graphics then well you are just exteremely immature.!!